From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: 05/05: gnu: Add ghc-hspec-discover.
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 10:08:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2tcxh3y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <20200208144029.3072.2814@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20200208144032.CCDFC21049@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <87wo8wpbfj.fsf@ngyro.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54048)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1j0iaE-000546-Kb
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 04:08:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1j0iaD-000822-EL
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 04:08:54 -0500
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:40835)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
 id 1j0iaD-000819-8l
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 04:08:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87wo8wpbfj.fsf@ngyro.com> (Timothy Sample's message of "Sun, 09
 Feb 2020 00:38:40 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> writes:

> We already have =E2=80=9Chspec-discover=E2=80=9D without the =E2=80=9Cghc=
=E2=80=9D prefix.  The two
> packages look identical to me =E2=80=93 is this an unintentional copy?

Oh! I hadn't noticed!

Well, is there any strong reason to use "hspec-discover" over
"ghc-hspec-discover", besides that it already exists?

For the arguments in favor of using ghc-hspec-discover:
- every other "hspec" package uses the "ghc-" prefix,
- the hackage importer names it,
- the hackage importer will add "ghc-hspec-discover" as an input anyway.

So what about deprecating "hspec-discover" in favor of
"ghc-hspec-discover"?

Thanks for the heads up!

Regards,

--=20
Nicolas Goaziou