From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Using the Hetzner Cloud Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:39:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2t1kkya.fsf@elephly.net> References: <57dc667e-5a69-45f7-e076-914d4691020c@web.de> <87o8txynuv.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j3nAn-0000ra-Ew for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:39:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j3nAm-0002Qa-En for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:39:21 -0500 In-reply-to: <87o8txynuv.fsf@cbaines.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Baines Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guix-europe@gnu.org Christopher Baines writes: > Coupled with this, I think there are some services (hpc.guix.info, ...) > it would be nice to move off bayfront (a machine in Bordeaux) to > somewhere that's more reliable/remotely accessible, mostly to avoid the > risk of me breaking them again when attempting to reconfigure bayfront. That=E2=80=99s unfortunate. Why is bayfront less reliable than we want it = to be? Surely that=E2=80=99s not because it=E2=80=99s using Guix System, beca= use {berlin,ci}.guix.gnu.org also runs Guix System and has been reliably hosting services for us. I would not mind hosting services on one of the 30 new servers the MDC bought for ci.guix.gnu.org, but I=E2=80=99d be happier if we figured out wh= at=E2=80=99s wrong with bayfront instead of centralizing all services in Berlin=E2=80=A6 --=20 Ricardo