From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id UDhmIArq2F9kEQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:53:30 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4Fk2HArq2F/qeQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:53:30 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AABB9402A2 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpDZo-0003J4-Q8 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:53:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpDZZ-0003Ij-CD for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:53:13 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:53026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpDZX-0007kQ-L4 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:53:13 -0500 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55ED826665; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:53:10 -0500 (EST) References: <87y2i0hzlw.fsf@dustycloud.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber To: Luis Felipe Subject: Re: A weird thing about network connections in Icecat (and Firefox) on Guix In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:52:37 -0500 Message-ID: <87y2hzggfe.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.116.34.160; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "help-guix@gnu.org" Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.31 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0AABB9402A2 X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: qfoiae9nMYtj Thanks for testing. Maybe I should open up wireshark and do some sniffing around. Luis Felipe writes: > Hey Chris, > > I can't reproduce the behavior you describe. I'm using > > guix 08d8c2d > linux-libre 5.9.12-gnu > IceCat 78.5.0esr (64-bit) > > > I did the following twice: > > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original = Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 > On Monday, December 14, 2020 9:00 PM, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > > [...] > >> Here's roughly the scenario: >> >> - Have icecat/firefox open and browsing websites. >> - Oops, something happens to the network. Maybe the wifi router goes >> out briefly or something. > > > I unplugged the UTP cable from my computer and made sure I had no access = to anything from IceCat. > > >> - You're back! You can ssh into servers again and connect to irc, and >> even ungoogled-chromium seems fine to browse websites. >> > > > I plugged the cable back in. > > >> - But weirdly... you have to restart icecat/firefox for things to work >> right again. > > > I tried browsing the Web using IceCat again, and it worked normally. > > >> Anyone else experience the same? I tried describing this and it soun= ded >> like I was the only one having the issue a couple of years ago. Now >> that I'm not my only household member experiencing the same, I suspe= ct >> we are probably not alone...? > > > I'm not sure I've experienced the same, but I'm sure I usually had to res= tart my desktop session whenever the Internet went out before. This hasn't = been the case in months, though.