From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kPL2HM6BHmDtOQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:47:26 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id CLPCGM6BHmDATwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:47:26 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62739401DF for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 11:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M3g-0001BW-Kn for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:47:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M3J-0001AQ-TE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:47:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M3J-00051g-Jq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:47:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M3J-0008O5-I7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46215] [PATCH] Add yadm Resent-From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46215 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Prikler Cc: 46215@debbugs.gnu.org, me@elken.dev X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: guix-patches@gnu.org, 46215@debbugs.gnu.org, Ellis =?UTF-8?Q?Keny=C5=91?= Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161261197930097 (code B ref -1); Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:47:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 11:46:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M2d-0007p1-91 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:46:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M2b-0007nh-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:46:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M2b-000160-Ne for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:46:17 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:40382) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8M2Z-0004jB-Dc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:46:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=6SFXa/oI30kAcxMuZczYR7/FM55VvJwye4xAmdcxiM0=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=O681G2xGqYouXtS2xm7Z9L1rPUAW3PRj+0Av7 RdmeZPD8Rrg05Ls9j5Pkj26IyPOp4gGznFzIiiHvPXHbp7UFBfUupoM9byJq+dDU/bpplf EIADqJDAVQYm/1Bxda9gEU1JcxpQwlmgA+UPRhkL6119IiS+5Wk0tcGHIrWrmKPf+Lk9I2 oLDptS7eZ1CzLf9+TCe7T/NHFMBmbuNeym12qmchhqa8S9Qp3dbfvkvmlQ5aZ8FQi6lxAn JleclPRFpSkV5KAB6/CwuJXfLb36EofPYCyR2txrVlYVBUJd89ugSGno5V6qOV9Ut4lfrI FUi2BXnu7M3rEb8QXJw/5k4XQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b1628d00 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 6 Feb 2021 11:46:56 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; References: <20210131164721.8792-1-me@elken.dev> <84ab5054792abeb5e9b85d21229cd7182204d817.camel@student.tugraz.at> <87czxkc0yv.fsf@elken.dev> <0ff6a0c2cc9a2f65cd51c1eeb9e6a33aa4789766.camel@student.tugraz.at> <669deac8-ffa5-42ba-8741-3cae0b18220e@elken.dev> <38ed969df583e9254802fa7a4a80299ec5caddc4.camel@student.tugraz.at> <9efaa5895bc488ddd4fd8c456aa5c2fdf09cb4af.camel@student.tugraz.at> <87pn1dpkwr.fsf@elken.dev> <9b32a7b7-9664-4108-a66c-f3de42d10c68@elken.dev> <78f1ced9e2125994a806383fb1d985d256874a81.camel@student.tugraz.at> In-reply-to: <78f1ced9e2125994a806383fb1d985d256874a81.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:46:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2g1wha4.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice X-ACL-Warn: , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.46 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=O681G2xG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B62739401DF X-Spam-Score: -4.46 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: YzTqeO73KkAK --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo, Ellis, Leo Prikler =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I'd like to say "use your best judgement", but you seem to be a=20 > little > too fixated on having a minimal package description (and putting > minimal effort into it). That's uncalled for. It's certainly not the impression I get. > For instance, when the package advertises encryption, while it=20 > is > technically optional, shipping it without gpg would be a grave=20 > oversight! Well, that depends. My own rule of thumb for =E2=80=98foo supports=20 encryption!=E2=80=99 is: $ gpg bash: gpg: command not found $ foo --encrypt error: whoopsie: BUG in do_foo()+0x4f44! <16 lines of barftrace> error: warning: error: No such file or directory. (-ERROR) $ =3D> Make gpg an input, and quick. $ gpg bash: gpg: command not found $ foo --encrypt error: gpg not found, please install it. $ =3D> This is totally fine, users who want it know what to do next. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYB6Bgw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15xkoBAMFThoVuK+dIf/i917Fnk9RBNFcUxKXqqRH3BhIH R3pRAQD4XlUZH8EIba0nh3sd05OneuL0V/H9xzHA1fyzPctxBg== =U7xR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--