From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id uLHQM/U17WEdCgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:03:17 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id iIYpMfU17WERhAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:03:17 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B681944C for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:03:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBaeR-00012a-Mo for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:03:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBaeE-00012K-MD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:03:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBaeE-0005Pa-Ck for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:03:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBaeE-00057u-8N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:03:02 -0500 Subject: bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 40558 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: elaexuotee@wilsonb.com Mail-Followup-To: 40558@debbugs.gnu.org, rekado@elephly.net, jlicht@fsfe.org Received: via spool by 40558-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D40558.164293576219669 (code D ref 40558); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 40558-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2022 11:02:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBadt-00057B-SR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:02:42 -0500 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nBadr-000572-TK for 40558-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 06:02:40 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1642935757; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=NBsIK7lz0CSMDtX2+YiyorLZNdHqmD8HzxYt/ep0RX9SM8MEpqy23S5Os6pcqQsWqrT4w8SoNuQQu7kxd4B2DxgtLTB1G4k3Y60N6JbD5Tb1WwQh8sMFGza6qWqEA+UwGYNPne0WjUbC2vs9yxLg59Q6f2updkTuG/rKjXPxfjk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1642935757; h=Content-Type:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=en55H5/XHBEmd7eHdogt2OjkJ70yW2clKkte/+LawoE=; b=YpadZonVuY2CVgO4PqomdQe6734jWg47LH6cA/vk4MLo5GNK+t7sn3WkIe32aW54iRoCv+cqSLL3aMleR5BYU+n+90lIZqV0SDPIF56Zw6jKOQWdvGfjjO4OJuA2ELYFMC3+vnXCv/e2oQ1TghRj07i+UZOIy2yj86FEoLal6Zw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1642935757; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=en55H5/XHBEmd7eHdogt2OjkJ70yW2clKkte/+LawoE=; b=OQrPUBPnVRtBJsDxwsOZUCN6WFi09sPOyXnxRsHec4Pk581pTHVN2t0Xj29LWwDA nVsG5xiy4fHcTSiqIjS+LJlbabpx6e6qZFv9l+Z3bCSn1RzurMiR8wcJUruC4vK/tKV Nrf6YUtOjupBkS9dsZ/BgS+jzOy/DpBn4JsZXY70= Received: from localhost (p508e82b6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.142.130.182]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1642935754246440.3150426412201; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 03:02:34 -0800 (PST) References: <874ktqxalv.fsf@jlicht.xyz> <27M6ZG86RAW9I.2JWF3V3MICGED@wilsonb.com> <8736203agz.fsf@elephly.net> <2O0C65TN1X0RC.2X8CEIYC1SBBG@wilsonb.com> <87sfthovg2.fsf@elephly.net> <321HNQCQ83DRR.3A7ZBRV3CBQ8S@wilsonb.com> <87o844p5sj.fsf@elephly.net> <2JED6QHA0S33Q.3I79W95FRDN8Q@wilsonb.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:55:57 +0100 In-reply-to: <2JED6QHA0S33Q.3I79W95FRDN8Q@wilsonb.com> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Message-ID: <87y236ogu1.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 40558-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1642935797; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=en55H5/XHBEmd7eHdogt2OjkJ70yW2clKkte/+LawoE=; b=YmKt8R8H/4Sj94JOwsXlVHKn0sRoRfOb3Fv+EbmedKQaGOrl2Dr8C969UtaZo5OJMnaqlb GhEJ2XXUeBwUhKWfkGXR5+xw4DDlfMKAvmq3Gf69jehebGxek5880VdtGqXwsYkoj7wOyT OGPlHzCjhYjGdk7DWVEg2GKoTW5Jt8eQr8PQJ4kHZdIYA3B7+PiDjYB58pj0z7D7ZGag4K EhVmvptO6eyXDBPTxXScwp+8OgdBxPpqMF82/eKCQcgtvJPblTsNKYNmvrRoI9h0zIVMqn /LQ0j82pSuxHlSiAor00KeHsh+DDREArgTQcgo3GVJcPkrlUmOlyJhBw3oU7Tg== ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1642935797; a=rsa-sha256; cv=fail; b=uoGy3vzVWaY5HZ20SRilW4OmJSkQpDZdPEaYhcKdiOJK0n+YD4rE0l+2PwcZOPvy7Ict3t Xr+CXzsRfjJCc7Ul16lXyNkPIGBeOIVJ6k5cOtgRJkFzglwF41eQXnXkJVa4xTaCYtxPjx GXJERbeGB4rygwNPINjHOlfDtFOlNEOnt/j4GektYpLxaeTXQKB/ZQhzz0chH9EIE+zTMg hro4F+fhZbvZdwkSFe8jkrp9lQAiRoCZHbpseC5m9/XFPBXdsH/sUAaXH7Tc7f4Dc766nO aIefshFW6AHR4HvLrvtRRlBILRTkheAdRniE1vID+5KU3AvpbpsoGNqT5Oulew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=OQrPUBPn; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=OQrPUBPn; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E8B681944C X-Spam-Score: -1.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 201G0rz45Ne2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable elaexuotee@wilsonb.com writes: >> At least the question =E2=80=9Cis texlive-amsfonts broken=E2=80=9D is de= finitively >> answered. This was what this issue was about, no? I=E2=80=99d rather k= eep the >> other issue separate. > > Well, it's still broken in the sense that we're not able to typeset with > eufm10, no? Something might be broken, but it=E2=80=99s not texlive-amsfonts. Going back to the first message in this bug report here I can no longer reproduce the problem. I used this manifest: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=manifest.scm Content-Description: manifest (specifications->manifest (list "texlive-amscls" "texlive-amsfonts" "texlive-base" "texlive-cm" "texlive-cm-super" "texlive-fontinst" "texlive-fonts-ec" "texlive-fonts-latex" "texlive-generic-ulem" "texlive-hyperref" "texlive-latex-amsmath" "texlive-latex-base" "texlive-latex-capt-of" "texlive-latex-preview" "texlive-latex-wrapfig" "texlive-latexconfig" "texlive-metafont" "texlive-oberdiek" "texlive-pstool" "texlive-unicode-data")) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain And this TeX file: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/x-tex Content-Disposition: inline; filename=broken.tex Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 XGRvY3VtZW50Y2xhc3NbMTFwdF17YXJ0aWNsZX0KXHVzZXBhY2thZ2V7YW1zbWF0aH0KXHVzZXBh Y2thZ2V7dWxlbX0KXGJlZ2lue2RvY3VtZW50fQpIZWxsbyEgXCh5ID0geF4yXCkKXGVuZHtkb2N1 bWVudH0K --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Running pdflatex on the file throws no errors and it produces a PDF file as expected. So I=E2=80=99ll close this issue. I suggest we keep investigating the prob= lem with eufm10 in issue 53339. --=20 Ricardo --=-=-=--