From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id INuLGRrr92Nk6AAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:39:22 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id gPSZGRrr92Ny1AAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:39:22 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D406E20 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:39:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVKF1-0004ba-7H; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:39:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVKEy-0004b5-V7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:39:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVKEw-00044O-Ls for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:39:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVKEw-0005pP-40 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61246] [PATCH v3 2/3] doc: Explain how to use local guix repositories. Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 22:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61246 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Cc: 61246@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 61246-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61246.167719193522390 (code B ref 61246); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 22:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 61246) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2023 22:38:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVKEo-0005p4-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:38:55 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com ([209.85.160.176]:34725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVKEm-0005or-VU for 61246@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:38:53 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id b6so6588068qtb.1 for <61246@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:38:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N1kL5/FOTPozGU1IIXoJoBSVUHedhwlTiFxaz5vJwGo=; b=bSR4+ygw/2dmO0EFG01bK94zsLkEukkaMuHfcAvvwnCiQcNH4jiTrdgBGMVVIlx8l2 EhApGCxx3Wyn6nUX651JCwurjODN1fnH0H7v6U382D7BZ1lpxM9VF32tl39UKSBV1Yzq Lv2gBWJ1yt5rNWFdWXIGUtTu79yHNCOtY0orgQGSE6ApMXoNwZoNcXYGJq1jCITOznmb Or87ZG6bQ/Gyb+/RXXqkc3v6lh0JC4BoSO03sQkxhWTwCc2dprct4je5Ih74eG3fiCWO 6No6OrKWk75aQLeuxNVkeIDBioi4i/6feGS3UGFC1EMKFwtaICqhAIJoGUQJwWCRRqiO Q6Rw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N1kL5/FOTPozGU1IIXoJoBSVUHedhwlTiFxaz5vJwGo=; b=zwWjbUDY/fTJXVXP8QE9H76wWWxLjO0JDMr7hozP8V1LG5Ot6TgqJ6JhqmXZ0FhTaC ZIxeiWfhLsaqcl3T2ZxFtbtuu3iqJBjqXsGWp6QV7nFfkzPmQVnvGu+6VpQXWcZ9OgOG DFiOo4DbE3mZd/NOC1KF5wFz9mELSnIA6poYxpwSZfzH9erjYoB+ws9X8Jg8m/CdmmdW Wn9WwN6n4AcNgcogirtmyPhaf0XX4bQbm0CKnEbkdsB+CWn9aWuvwoO9f4Dh4fIZbMih qKVeYiNIb9ADFcHZtyWJYp8txY+N7bd9H1wa4ladcq1osrwMnpsPB4ArtQV2DI3ePtWu p1EA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVwz+bkjU3bh8KZ+pbkSiH9MNdASEb/4+noWnkYMsR51/NAs481 qr1gBw+XyFaRyKBmaDLGZsGSqqCJz1rMcA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8Dha4Ox1FJcnL62AIzmYKseb1+biGqm9IyHF31TFbqQY8lxoipzXTsJVR421NOKqZ6XPrrtA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7fc8:0:b0:3b8:6a41:c329 with SMTP id b8-20020ac87fc8000000b003b86a41c329mr20695225qtk.21.1677191927104; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:38:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-129-1.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.129.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 145-20020a370397000000b0073b79edf46csm3328111qkd.83.2023.02.23.14.38.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:38:46 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87a61ogomz.fsf@gmail.com> <20230217190640.1914-1-nandre@riseup.net> <87r0uoqd2j.fsf@gmail.com> <87fsb2q3kr.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:38:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista"'s message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:43:18 -0300") Message-ID: <87y1oogg7e.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=bSR4+ygw; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1677191962; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fplOE29VO0Vdgp7RveURJnlTLXipgejPp9bK1DcbpmTcbM+RMJoMH56KimpndJiB3dbHu6 /71xUZ+Cht/15XVT2PKNdhdM6rad3dwmMT4MowaIQWkrL2p0qC/pAAE7NBMVagQlu2duAo 4rKEiFE4DuIOGRQ1ko+bPwkUR3eXGIBgMRsUDFwds1xGKE3e1YGJh8hc3e2kAx1x9WZi3L eTk3rXiIIG1246k/V9CeezxkZoQ23iuTgi159IXpyTd2cFVD5y6NNk/C91EjilQC5dGMZZ RUiQcYZtvQnRsxC0hP3brQl89D3UjRNKILAqZ8HJJNF5aY2O7hkcNHmkSvR9iw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1677191962; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=N1kL5/FOTPozGU1IIXoJoBSVUHedhwlTiFxaz5vJwGo=; b=iDvdMMVBURtNCb6Nl9OgZohkaJzYLs/7tqTHa/D6qgPh3XxCWVN2twUk8WnLZErYohVZE1 guEH0hYrXjdkOLKnbX44vJlKWpI42mN6Dv5LhuCFTOPWjSRahFPdddv+p2ltmtwod/LQpv oCdw/0qF79b0+D0p782ub6cNGFp50HHUNNxXmMbMqlqLDyjMqDg1ZalZcse76lis92AseD wDRpFATl6rvX21bXtX0CSpN0982AdlfFCozE+vgbdWOUiizQMsoT4yVr4P5qcyt1CyZJAA zkTbZb03hR17nbYqZ/0jWloUTSkMDTRk94s15dwbWir2u8d69ugUXdALeyS9Rg== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.07 X-Spam-Score: -2.07 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 41D406E20 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=bSR4+ygw; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) X-TUID: ht03aOLInSTF Hi, Andr=C3=A9 Batista writes: > Hi Maxim, > > s=C3=A1b 18 fev 2023 =C3=A0s 12:35:32 (1676734532), maxim.cournoyer@gmail= .com enviou: >> (...) >> >> Perhaps you meant to use @command{git} in the above instead of >> >> @command{guix}, since it's specific to Git (and the configure snippet= is >> >> for Git) ? >> > >> > Not really. It's guix itself and its subcommands which will fail in >> > this scenario, not git, even though it's because guix is using git >> > configuration through libgit2. To me it would be misleading to use >> > @command{git} there. I could come up with a more detailed >> > description, however, I don't think this would be the place to be >> > diving on a detailed discussion of guix internals. I'm up to >> > suggestions though if you think this patch would make people wonder >> > if it is a typo. > > Just to be sure we are on the same page on this: have you followed on > #55399? AKA Guix has a choice to make here since we could just as > well decide to diverge from git and disable owner validation checks > entirely in Guix. On the one side, users wouldn't need to bother with > git configuration and the manual could do without this patch. On the > other, would this divergence have any security implications? As far > as I can see it doesn't, but I may not be seeing far enough and we > would be hard coding and burying this decision in Guix. > > Also we wouldn't be exempting one chosen directory of these checks, > but disabling it altogether in Guix. I'm not sure of the security implications this new git switch tries addressing, so I'd have to read about it more before I can commit on what's right to do. In the meantime, we have a recent libgit2 and users have instructions about dealing with its new security "features", so it still seems a plus to me. --=20 Thanks, Maxim