Josselin Poiret via Guix-patches via writes:

Hello again!

> From: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
>
[..]

> * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash,
> glibc-final): Use libc-for-target.

As discussed on IRC, I found that we're still building glibc-2.35 during
commencement.  I overlooked that this recent patch of yours made these
changes in commencement, so I already made patches for this (attached).

So, apart from my earlier comments

[..]

> diff --git a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> index ab07fb37ab..a24c60ebf8 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
> @@ -2816,13 +2816,13 @@ (define (%boot1-inputs)
>      ("binutils-cross" ,binutils-boot0)
>      ,@(alist-delete "binutils" (%boot0-inputs))))
>  
> -(define glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash
> +(define/system-dependent glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash
>    ;; The final libc, "cross-built".  If everything went well, the resulting
>    ;; store path has no dependencies.  Actually, the really-final libc is
>    ;; built just below; the only difference is that this one uses the
>    ;; bootstrap Bash.
>    (package
> -    (inherit glibc)
> +    (inherit (libc-for-target))
>      (name "glibc-intermediate")
>      (outputs (delete "debug" (package-outputs glibc)))

We probably want this to be (libc-for-target), even though they're
bound to be similar, and more importantly,

>      (source (bootstrap-origin (package-source glibc)))

I believe this needs to be (libc-for-target) to actually use glibc-2.37.

[..]

> +  (let ((libc (libc-for-target)))
> +    (package/inherit libc
> +      (name "glibc")
> +      (source (bootstrap-origin (package-source glibc)))

Likewise, I think we need to use "libc" here.

Greetings,
Janneke