From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id mBuuEZrIeGfEQQEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:35:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id mBuuEZrIeGfEQQEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 06:35:22 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=mlEaSDf7; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=bzphlC8E; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1735968922; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=MJw9G/f3qtHm0i457t7ssXJOQGiqUq7Txz3w10GFh1w=; b=fOk9jAy5FyI3+5RfO2LMlnjko+I5pt1cFfQjqD/2AGO9OzxMPRzveIUiHWbUa3UyLV5D23 OKT7epOGMHW2+hLs0LKvHEsi81QFWRdKkDhh0VZwW6VCzITOstJO074QXRJSpeB/13BHXo /F9Kg7FuSXhRmXP+wXn8AWcu6vEYE2AblQ5J4rhf5MiQYc/UgjB1TAU+XcB0HyHogcQOPk LbA/WpH9hCi8+PsMV5gZl2ukFtRK91QmrH5UFrXlNG3BxMaILaaXqs2n9kYNZfSAlh98Lq rNwVlWElf1Is6jcNiTWLI2NKId8h+FrM8LNY1tEmxgg1qJjpePpoqY+MBMAi7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=mlEaSDf7; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=bzphlC8E; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1735968922; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mxAe9DeJ0qZKS36sBtm0BVUdDkkDSB/F2XME+i2FvC2ZiQVEhlUNqt/azDbi66K8UFt9Q7 Xn5xTt26g2ohQpx0hOqaySIvsT26q66N5ksLdU+etiy+GnmJCBJQ17eNT+KYM9UlaFg4dL fYbaTYkmKy7rReCqQttSvGOXPkFYJHwVTpApeNoGaUuwKv02OhRvtCpXliSNs/FccVwckP lbTvTCvriH+6+T8LTY31pD9aRc8eNb/1CixbKIKpu2MPS5oSYdLCVnIM3OaZdFpUZLL075 VnXUkcDfPqUpq+/i37pltVN5rVVF4lv5xrzpon5hcEPopjm+lAWfqbq4aadyNA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35F01A1C1 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 06:35:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwoR-0007oa-Uv; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:35:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwoQ-0007oO-TF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:35:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwoQ-0003bP-Gk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:35:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=MJw9G/f3qtHm0i457t7ssXJOQGiqUq7Txz3w10GFh1w=; b=mlEaSDf7hTYMvPw0PVZ5j5h2o+V7ohpKvVskvsmHcH5TunMuMBfRGLNDnt+bv+jivJuhZrL3yneRUq7iQhBVguK6uCGSp4ihmVzDRf8QLBF517QVGtmlfSBI32orKR1EPHEuJraKOqB7g5K1ZjdMKfvyMde6ArWeENf4jMtOgnByBlNBzFXT5UpAnst43OjxOiNqPhaN1GZzm3yb4DLsXbe5+I4WHG63hnrbrexbXwBpiIx7/jsC9n8HUodpE+1JWjCr1elAew8LW0aHK7Cj4n0Kwk2xZJPDfo070/z01vSJ52Zkh5RTbYO0klnXRWxQJk4gDOxcd7BguVsBfiTjxQ==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwoQ-0002ck-At for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74780] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 74780@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 74780-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74780.173596887010038 (code B ref 74780); Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 74780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2025 05:34:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53033 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwnu-0002bp-23 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:34:30 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]:13607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tTwnr-0002bW-Nw for 74780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2025 00:34:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1735968861; x=1736228061; bh=MJw9G/f3qtHm0i457t7ssXJOQGiqUq7Txz3w10GFh1w=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=bzphlC8EckXmzduJb6/PE9C+Ec9+oREjQxSjnqK0M+MtME/9rlRWnO3T0jFg1T2L8 kmP0Pra/IcDDhhzYgs7uzIyqTi6h+/BdqfmVoImQuGiJaWVOAJi1pHfVLawgNNX4JD o3XmwiuejdPN9lphk4F27cBom90FDi3xNaVATR3JIHcrO1lf0wlTGjJMDY2JkiRqO+ eOHkulkwTrH7U/Rk5uYLWUcAg1qnAr56aNB6TERQiaw+xa/n5unHJzmVJgN5MiayQ3 cWHZzqyU56NzSy0xxWU+ZcbHSyQRifmTc4lDz0v85Md97qU95VzhjHTSSMcqC1V4Bo iFJxH/y+vxwxw== Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 05:34:17 +0000 Message-ID: <87y0zrdtwq.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <8734iubuk1.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cqxfik.fsf@protonmail.com> <877c7ir0y8.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: f94545286613408cda8111db31188749cb58919b MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: John Kehayias X-ACL-Warn: , John Kehayias via Guix-patches From: John Kehayias via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.99 X-Spam-Score: -4.99 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F35F01A1C1 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: 7qYa8hHbty3I On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 09:46 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 03:57 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Hey John and all, >> >> It=E2=80=99s the turn of the =E2=80=9Cmesa-updates=E2=80=9D branch to be= merged: >> >> >> >> :-) >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Thanks for checking in. > > I just rebased and pushed. I'll keep an eye on it but didn't notice > any big failures (plenty on earlier evaluations but mostly due to the > python merge from what I can tell). > > The question is what the substitute coverage will be like on > non-x86_64-linux. It had already been about 9-10 days from the last > update and didn't seem like much progress. And with QA back up but > very behind, not sure if we expect that to tell us anything soon. > > Should I give it a day or so to build the current rebase and then just > merge? From Efraim's local builds and given the nature of the commits, > I don't expect any big surprises. > > (Side note: does i686-linux have priority on Berlin or something like > that? The last few weeks I notice many more active i686 builds after a > push with many pending builds. The current evaluation, for instance: > the vast majority of workers are idle, and then the vast majority of > active are i686 builds. Or is that from just generally being behind on > i686 so there's just more of that to do?) > > Thanks! > John QA page still hasn't updated and it has been another 5 days from the last message. Unless there are any objections I'll do a rebase and merge later this weekend. John