From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#16534: gstreamer-1.0.10 tests fail Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:32:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqhmo7xb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52E23FA3.6020405@totakura.in> <20140124210403.GA369@debian> <87iot9xdtt.fsf@gnu.org> <20140126111204.GA5446@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49899) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VS9-0005tw-HY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:33:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VS3-0002YL-3H for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:33:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VS2-0002YF-Vl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:33:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VS2-0000Ch-FO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:33:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20140126111204.GA5446@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sun, 26 Jan 2014 12:12:04 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: 16534@debbugs.gnu.org, Sree Harsha Totakura Andreas Enge skribis: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:35:58PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> The last good commit was 40fed2d according to Hydra, and then it=E2=80= =99s not >> clear when it broke because Hydra wasn=E2=80=99t healthy, but the GLib u= pdate is >> a suspect. > > I tried updating to glib-2.39.3. But the patches do not apply any more, > which is tedious! Could we work towards glib being more guix friendly? > It looks to me as if the cases handled by glib-tests-newnet.patch and > glib-tests-prlimit.patch could be classified as bugs and reported. Right, I=E2=80=99ll take care of reporting a bug for these two files. However, am I right that these are not the ones that no longer apply? :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.