From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 23:57:39 +0100
Message-ID: <87wqhbkdng.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <52EA7F73.9010302@totakura.in> <20140130223912.GA12116@debian>
	<52EAD88B.70409@totakura.in> <874n4k87ce.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20140203221950.GB23992@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59793)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WASXR-00054V-3Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:02:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WASXK-0003nw-V9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:02:49 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:55979)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1WASXK-0003nm-Q6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:02:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20140203221950.GB23992@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon,
	3 Feb 2014 23:19:50 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 05:05:37PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Note for upstream: It would be great to use GnuTLS instead of OpenSSL,
>> especially given that OpenSSL=E2=80=99s license may be incompatible with=
 the GPL
>> in this case.
>
> From my trials, I think openssl is used only for "make check".
> So it should probably pass into native-inputs.
>
>> Could you check with =E2=80=98guix gc --references $(guix build gnunet)=
=E2=80=99 if the
>> reference on OpenSSL is retained?  If not, that=E2=80=99s fine, but othe=
rwise
>> that=E2=80=99s not cool.
>
> There is no reference to openssl left.

OK, thanks for testing.  Then indeed, OpenSSL can be moved to
=E2=80=98native-inputs=E2=80=99 (it won=E2=80=99t be used when cross-compil=
ing anyway, right?).

Ludo=E2=80=99.