From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Karetnikov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] guix substitute-binary: Support the Signature field of a narinfo file. Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 16:24:09 +0400 Message-ID: <87wqfv8xau.fsf@karetnikov.org> References: <87txcqesqv.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87ha8qo7rl.fsf@gnu.org> <8761p5jv1g.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87r47tfmes.fsf@gnu.org> <8738k0pj8c.fsf@karetnikov.org> <874n4fnhs7.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppmigld8.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87y514dv2u.fsf@gnu.org> <87y50wffjy.fsf_-_@karetnikov.org> <874n3kp46f.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhwqsxjr.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87bnxl62ws.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3c4joyt.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87a9cz9f1k.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjkxysfi.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87lhwfljcx.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87lhwfijdp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3bz3s5y.fsf_-_@karetnikov.org> <87eh25n5jb.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnx9rcf1.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87a9ctn20o.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOnWb-0004yM-Gs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 08:17:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOnWa-0006qH-Nn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 08:17:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a9ctn20o.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:53:59 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>> I was about to say you could push to master, but since the new >>> substitute-binary will refuse any unsigned archives[*], it may be wiser >>> to push to a special branch so we can test it in real life before >>> merging into master. >> Should the special branch be based on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 or =E2=80= =98core-updates=E2=80=99? > On =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99. Done. Since some tests on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 fail for me, could you = run =E2=80=98make check=E2=80=99 to make sure that it doesn=E2=80=99t break anything? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTJEZsAAoJEM+IQzI9IQ38zlIQAILaSvyi2IbC0DitsTXETpmM P9CLEQhGgRunNAZfU/wdWeyQ2t2DJVpn7gotFpllJgtRN6SQwX4r5wTYrksWKNrU N+u3wj0tE0Pls0pD9ZCJZUwmWd/fEntYixSxYAbgHNtT1e2svsojtmtqsbDXZ44l ZH8focjK67kyWfsDTJm8ez0CXRhx6YzVeOe5IxwinMU8B+n2S8hVFnebpaA1EwqR RRIj8ZkVOrpQ44+hL7ZDzWovkWAx2VAwLLHb41X84mSDsG0fE70zmkVGMX/JglBd Zm3b/4tZMeQnHhH75FsoCypNJt/HDu1J1Ht6fP2sk7UBjrXcscWL0z41LvBE/U4n 0KD2rfIY7wnYh2LJ/zwvU+QsLChtw/jQjm6ANW3oTLYmLsavmi3VPspdUIdZ7Q2U iGPGBNB90QD5FyNqi9WrP/T+iS6BogGS+hQ5pLjrmxNjFAF2ep7RIzD7sJ3KTvrf tBiKTEifFcA94sLbTSvKqxGIM1LwfYaC0ZUneF1JHWWbARhDJMAnI0KPSH2WHzCJ XnwMAQFSMaQbfvWdgEuPUCC7yrE3FlIBIzw5Ecq9rzx5ZgVyJBBmtk8N2ipjvOQ3 4SCOslboWt1TjZxAKKw5KzzE3mFhizC/Sq1B8cIOLRHO40hexiX/UUyaQtWIApiH AW9P9BzqCawPSGT6viDQ =ZJnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--