From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>,
bug-hurd@gnu.org, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GSoC: Porting Guix to Hurd week 3+4 report.
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 22:22:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpzo1oqk.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFtzXzOgZ1zLJJunfA7A9iM514JnPjho4j=G4JUnF-0SfLV0+Q@mail.gmail.com> (Manolis Ragkousis's message of "Sun, 31 May 2015 11:13:44 +0300")
Hi Manolis,
Thanks for the report!
Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com> skribis:
> 3) Found a circular dependency between glibc-hurd-headers and
> hurd-minimal. Resolved it
> and sent a patch to the list. (Ludovic please give it a look :-))
Will do shortly, sorry for the delay!
> 4) tarball-package in make-bootstrap.scm does not give the right name
> to the packages it produces.
> Changed tarball-package so now we can pass the target to it and as a
> result it will use the proper name.
>
> 5) gcc-4.7 passes "--with-native-system-header-dir=" which points to
> the wrong libc. According to my
> understanding this should point to the proper libc to be used in the
> target system. Am I right?
>
> 6) So the problem with %gcc-static is that libdecnumber: sets "dpd"
> while libgcc: sets "no" and we get
> a build failure because it can't find "no" in libdecnumber. Found a
> similar case here
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg00941.html . Turned everything
> in make-bootstrap.scm into procedures
> so I am sure it evaluates to the right libc,
Note that all three points are related, AIUI. That is, using procedures
in make-bootstrap.scm means that the right glibc package gets chosen,
which in turn means that #4 and #5 get fixed.
> patched libdecunmber's and libgcc's configure.ac so they run
> AC_CANONICAL_{BUILD,HOST,TARGET} and made sure with the repl that the
> right glibc is used. And still can't find how to solve it. Any
> suggestions?
Does the issue reported in the 2007 message above still holds? What
exactly was the error when cross-compiling libgcc? The Hurd folks may
have seen it before.
Thanks for all the uneasy & frustrating work!
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-31 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-31 8:13 GSoC: Porting Guix to Hurd week 3+4 report Manolis Ragkousis
2015-05-31 20:22 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2015-06-02 14:06 ` Manolis Ragkousis
2015-06-02 15:55 ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-06-03 21:25 ` Manolis Ragkousis
2015-06-04 20:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-06-07 20:55 ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-06-08 11:43 ` Manolis Ragkousis
2015-06-08 12:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-06-08 13:12 ` Manolis Ragkousis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpzo1oqk.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=Guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=bug-hurd@gnu.org \
--cc=manolis837@gmail.com \
--cc=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.