From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: haskell-mode Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:36:44 +0300 Message-ID: <87wpxc4kgz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fv41rjd8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMEz5-0007s1-2o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:36:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMEz1-0004W7-SE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:36:51 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]:35513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMEz1-0004Vo-KA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:36:47 -0400 Received: by lbbpo9 with SMTP id po9so3078444lbb.2 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:36:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Federico Beffa's message of "Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:50:33 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Federico Beffa Cc: Guix-devel Federico Beffa (2015-08-03 10:50 +0300) wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Alex Kost wrote: >> Federico Beffa (2015-08-01 19:18 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose to change the name of package 'haskell-mode' >>> to 'emacs-haskell-mode' as we recently started doing for emacs >>> packages. >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> I agree on this, but I don't understand the convention of naming emacs >> packages. What about "geiser", "emms", "magit", "paredit"? I have a >> feeling they shouldn't be renamed into "emacs-geiser", =E2=80=A6 but I c= an't >> explain why. > > The discussion on naming was very quick: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00309.html > > From my point of view, if we want to be consistent we should use the > same prefix for all packages providing Emacs libraries/extensions. > Choices based on feelings are just going to make things confusing. I was confused because you proposed to rename only 'haskell-mode'. I think it is better to rename all emacs packages in once. --=20 Alex