From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: bug#19219: New command-line syntax for package + version? Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:31:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87wpr7xp8g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20141129203122.GA15720@debian> <87ppbws61p.fsf@gnu.org> <874mfssrxd.fsf@gnu.org> <87si3ah1d1.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9jblks4.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2o7h3ux.fsf@gnu.org> <8737uu9pro.fsf@gnu.org> <87oad8vxkx.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87io3fo8sl.fsf@gnu.org> <874meyoo1x.fsf@gnu.org> <877fjjo3m2.fsf@gnu.org> <8737tvmhok.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aL5FL-0007Kx-Es for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:33:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aL5FG-0000i7-FA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:33:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aL5FG-0000i3-CP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:33:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aL5FG-0004Uf-4D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:33:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8737tvmhok.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:10:35 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 19219@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Following the poll, it seems there=E2=80=99s a slight preference for the > =E2=80=9Cguile@1.8=E2=80=9D syntax (and I admit it=E2=80=99s also my pref= erence; hope I=E2=80=99m not > too biased ;-)). I have the same impression. > Mathieu, would you be willing/available to implement the change? I am free of any school project for now, so I can work on it. -- Mathieu Lirzin