From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Names of R packages
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:00:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87wppvg5sn.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20160222194201.GC29652@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46288)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aY8pn-0007jU-ED
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:00:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aY8pj-0003E9-BN
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:00:43 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25683)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aY8pi-0003Dl-UA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:00:39 -0500
In-reply-to: <20160222194201.GC29652@solar>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> when tentatively calling "guix refresh", I saw a number of packages
> called "r-r-...", for instance "r-r-oo". Should this not be simplified
> to "r-oo"? We do not have separate packaging rules for R, but in analogy
> with python and perl, it would make sense to preprend "r-" and at the
> same time drop all other occurrences of R inside the original name.
>
> What do you think?

I’d like to keep it the way it is.  In CRAN there are a number of
packages with very similar names such as “graph” and “rgraph”, or “utils”
and “R.utils”.  There is also a great number of R packages that happen
to start with “R” or “r”, such as “Rmarkdown” or “rtracklayer”.

In the case of “R.oo” (which we name “r-r-oo”) there is no other package
with a conflicting name, but I find it very hard to know when I should
strip off “r-” to get the desired package in other cases.

The prefix “r-” isn’t as long as “python-” or “perl-”, so to me it
doesn’t seem so bad to keep it, especially when it helps disambiguate
packages with otherwise similar names.

~~ Ricardo