From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add khmer. Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:58:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87wplcmfua.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1466126601-30932-1-git-send-email-donttrustben@gmail.com> <20160625172911.GD21038@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bH6px-0005Jl-HM for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 05:58:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bH6pt-0005Zs-Dg for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 05:58:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160625172911.GD21038@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:29:11 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: Guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:23:18AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: >> This isn't the best name for a piece of software I suggest, but it is >> reasonably well known in the field. >>=20 >> 'murmur-hash' takes the code from a repository SMHasher, but I'm not >> interested in packaging that. That is OK? > > I looked at the Debian package [0]. It uses the bundled copy or > murmur-hash. Since there doesn't really seem to be an independent > upstream distribution of murmur, I think it's fine to do the same. > > What do others think? I agree. Just leave a comment explaining the situation so we can revisit it later if the need arises. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.