From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix ldc. Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 22:21:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpjrrozh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160803095110.3e5cf1bc@scratchpost.org> <20160803092015.8541-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20160808190611.33e652df@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWr2e-0004v2-N9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:20:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWr2Z-000433-9x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 16:20:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160808190611.33e652df@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Any news on this? Sorry, I haven't found the time to review your patches yet. Hopefully, someone else can help with these patches too. > Meanwhile, I have a new patch to provide ldc-1.1.0-beta2. What should I do with it? Make a new patch series and refer to this one as prerequisite? > > I've also added dub and updated rdmd, should this be in a new-new patch series? Please provide separate patches for each package (update or new).