Pjotr Prins writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 06:54:30PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Pjotr Prins skribis: >> >> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:22:48PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >> You can always get the right source code by running “guix build -S >> >> package”. >> >> >> >> OTOH having the source directly in the “debug” (or “source”?) output as >> >> you suggest would be more convenient. >> >> >> >> The only downside is the extra size of the “debug” output. Most of the >> >> time that’s a price people are happy to pay when they are installing the >> >> “debug” output. But sometimes maybe not. >> > >> > How about a :debug-full switch? >> >> There’s no switch, only a “debug” output. > > yes, yes. I meant a "debug-full" output. We have "guix build -S foo" which fetches the source. It sounds like you're suggesting that we remove this and replace it with a "source" (or "debug-full") output for each package, so to get the source you would run "guix build foo:source" instead. Is my understanding correct? -- Chris