From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?Let=E2=80=99s?= freeze and build
	=?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99!?=
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:39:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87wpc2s9bn.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87mvdpw3b3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87zihoizr4.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87tw7wspwp.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87zihfwshj.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20170221173201.GA9718@jasmine> <20170221174149.GA5944@jasmine>
	<87innmzrrt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87lgsi60z5.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39954)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ckujz-0003hM-Hu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:40:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ckujw-0005ZQ-Eu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:40:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87lgsi60z5.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	(Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:31:10 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> Looks like there=E2=80=99s been a disk space issue a few days ago that=
=E2=80=99s now
>> solved, so I=E2=80=99ve restarted an evaluation of the =E2=80=9Ccore=E2=
=80=9D subset.
>>
>> Is there any blocker left or should we move forward after that?
>
> We were waiting for the xorg-server 1.19.3 hotfix that was announced a
> few days ago [0], but it hasn't been released yet.
>
> I suggest we either run "autoreconf" in the build process of 1.19.2, or
> graft 1.19.3 when available. Any preference?
>
> [0] https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2017-March/002780.html

It=E2=80=99s been 3 days since their message and it hasn=E2=80=99t happened=
 yet, so
perhaps we should simply run autoreconf.

Thoughts?

BTW, xorg-server is a build-time dependency of gtk+@3 (for test
purposes), which is the main reason why it has so many dependents.
Perhaps it would be fine to keep using 1.9.12 for GTK+.  That way, we
can update xorg-server without rebuilding the world.

Ludo=E2=80=99.