From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <87wpbq7bh4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170313174039.25881.89989@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20170313174040.C5C6B20CAB@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<878to8qssk.fsf@netris.org>
	<87innc43ub.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<871stzh8rv.fsf@netris.org> <20170314212701.GA8440@jasmine>
	<874lyv4jx7.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20170314215913.GA13036@jasmine>
	<87y3w733ue.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87vara3cqc.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52073)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1coBkk-0004Fc-EB
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:26:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1coBkg-0001s0-EE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:26:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vara3cqc.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	(Marius Bakke's message of "Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:12:43 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Patch attached. I *think* the two values are for client and server
>> respectively, but will study the source and build logs some more to make
>> sure we're adjusting the right knobs.
>>
>> I suggest we try this on 'core-updates' if the patch is correct.
>
> The patch builds fine on x86_64, and I've verified that these are the
> correct settings by decreasing the values instead of increasing.
>
> What do you think? Should we check if 25s is high enough on
> 'core-updates' or push it directly to 'master'?

Good catch.

It might be best to push to =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 to focus our bui=
ld
resources.  No strong opinion though.

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.