From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46101)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d8S55-0007EJ-9F
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:55:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d8S52-0006DL-7E
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:55:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60799)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1d8S52-0006DE-4Q
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:55:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1d8S51-0001qo-P5
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:55:03 -0400
Subject: bug#25879: [PATCH] gnu: Add LLVM and CLANG 3.9.1.
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25879.D25879.14944244947088.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <87shn12p2i.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28180ob.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87d1dskjdh.fsf@gnu.org> <8737eosvgb.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170307212411.GA29363@mail.thebird.nl> <87bmr1i6l3.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87inl9gpvu.fsf@gnu.org> <877f1phvox.fsf@elephly.net>
	<rbuefvxqalq.fsf@gnu.org> <874lwthuxu.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87wp9okeqt.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
In-reply-to: <87wp9okeqt.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 15:54:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87wp9ohl5n.fsf@elephly.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org>
Cc: 25879-done@debbugs.gnu.org


Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes:

>>> So, is it OK to push the patch as-is then?
>>
>> Yes, please!  :)
>
> Pushed in 584da12dc71da745edb13bf748e832b77a0193d7.

Great!  Closing this bug.

>> If you can, it would be good to investigate if current users of 3.8
>> could be built with 3.9, but this doesn’t have to block this patch in my
>> opinion.
>>
>> If in fact all users of 3.8 can be built with 3.9 without problems you
>> can make the change in a follow-up commit.
>
> I am sure that at least 'c-reduce' does not build with 3.9.1.  So I
> think we'll need to take this on a per-program basis.  I'll see which
> ones can be built with 3.9.1.

Thanks for taking care of this!

-- 
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net