From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLCgA-0001Jw-EF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:06:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLCg6-00014D-DM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:06:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLCg6-000146-1w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLCg5-0005qR-NO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:06:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#26524] [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add python2-httpretty Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: References: <20170611010718.31874-1-fredmanglis@gmail.com> <20170611010718.31874-3-fredmanglis@gmail.com> <87tw3lhuha.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:05:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87wp8eh2c3.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Frederick Muriithi Cc: 26524@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Frederick Muriithi writes: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Muriithi Frederick Muriuki writes: >> >> Ugh. If you still have these patches, could you resubmit them to a new >> bug report? Let's use them as a basis for a new 'python-updates' branch. >> Please also include this patch as it did not apply for me. I've pushed >> the other two to 'master' with slightly adjusted commit messages. >> > > I did not retain the patches, but I'll regenerate them and send them. Great! > As for httpretty, it is one of the dependencies for conda: do I send > it here, or with the patches for the newer python? Please do not send patches to closed bug-reports like this one. You can send it with the others (but mention that it should go to 'master'), standalone, or preferably along with other Conda-related patches :-) Thanks! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAllBeuwACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpADgf/ZiQRUD96XUQKS13cgTP9xqgS5QbO21RkMQV0J6YYSsADco7Idx2VgVj9 nsZ7yjiBrbfi3jO0eejwCzpXOu8zFGP2rbBZi4cPMcXEbDYnepfeuuWa9VrefQxb Ihxh978Y0hXmEPamxe3g0fFAXErM5nUACd1lPOOXwebld2rDTGHHeHZzNvBmyL3L Fl2zLIjVd6TFW7kcYYSVBU3eiWjJdE61SObmq48mhRS7kwn+hqQchPY8AVBMiAtI UQdlp3ZT2CY83Q5dhHfnfxQMJteYHcdEQrB0f+H1wyoYHx7x8R41CJRtgLCxhi9z xCK4iwUsnfp8a4zVkao3lk1F3LqZqg== =G/0e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--