From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#27759: NTP pool vendor zone
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 14:36:58 +0200
Message-ID: <87wp6qf6dx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170718214256.GA20175@jasmine.lan> <87bmogma8b.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170720185914.GA18030@jasmine.lan>
	<20170730024322.GA32565@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39715)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dbnTx-0002XL-AE
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 08:38:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dbnTu-0003Vx-6z
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 08:38:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59259)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dbnTu-0003Vt-38
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 08:38:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dbnTt-0001Yv-TQ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 08:38:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27759.B27759.15014182325943@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170730024322.GA32565@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of
	"Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:43:22 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 27759@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Leo!

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:59:14PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:40:20PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>> > > They recommend we apply for a vendor zone instead [2]. We would not =
have
>> > > to run our own NTP servers.
>> > >
>> > > Does anyone know if GNU or the FSF have a vendor zone we could use?
>> > > Otherwise, we should apply for one and adjust our ntp-service.
>> >=20
>> > Apparently 1.gnu.pool.ntp.org does not exist, so I suppose we can apply
>> > for one.
>> >=20
>> > I=E2=80=99ll email the GNU maintainer list to let them know and double=
-check.
>>=20
>> Based on that discussion, I've applied for guix.pool.ntp.org.
>
> The DNS for {0,1,2,3}.guix.pool.ntp.org is live, and the attached patch
> is working for me.

Great!

> I think we should document that I am the administrative contact for the
> "zone". Any suggestions for where to document that?

At least as a comment in the definition of =E2=80=98%ntp-servers=E2=80=99?

Maybe we should also have a file in guix-maintenance.git listing
specific responsibilities like this, membership to linux-distros or
similar lists, privileged contact with upstream for specific packages,
etc.  WDYT?

> From e8fd9d703dba134dab7f008951e68d11d3d2ca21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:43:40 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] services: ntp: Use the NTP pool via the 'guix' zone.
>
> * gnu/services/networking.scm (%ntp-servers): Use *.guix.pool.ntp.org.

Yes!  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.