From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Grafting fails for latest Go release candidate Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 21:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87wp5v2ylv.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20170731143925.GA19814@jasmine.lan> <87wp6kuzrp.fsf@fastmail.com> <87wp6fb0p7.fsf@fastmail.com> <87efsljb63.fsf@igalia.com> <87378lszri.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8x04qky.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkEoU-0006G6-Q2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:26:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkEoQ-0004Pf-QR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:26:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h8x04qky.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Andy Wingo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marius Bakke writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Andy Wingo skribis: >> >>> On Mon 07 Aug 2017 22:08, Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> I've caught a couple other elusive grafting errors: >>>> >>>> grafting '/gnu/store/ccw7wzh9rbflc0fl968dbj2x0x9dn4y5-chromium-60.0.31= 12.90' -> '/gnu/store/b3f2d6l1c546xwcv4hg8619qh87cixhb-chromium-60.0.3112.9= 0'... >>>> ERROR: Wrong type to apply: "der */\n max-width: 638px;\n min"=20 >>> >>> This looks like a Guile 2.2 GC error somehow :-( >> >> Marius, Leo: was the failure on =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99, where Gu= ile 2.2 is used? >> (On =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 2.0 is used to build derivations.) > > Pretty sure I've seen these on 'master' at least once, but the majority > of grafting errors have been on 'core-updates'. > > However, I haven't had any since (very) recently, sometime between > 09ec5a0f0c..2718a9cd09 in my local "fork". ed464f48ef maybe? > > Or I've just been lucky. Most likely just lucky, new grafting failure today. I've noticed they are more likely to occur when the host system is busy. Grafting a large package such as 'texlive' is almost guaranteed to fail on a fully-utilized machine. Maybe we should switch back to 2.0 for the time being? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmchUwACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPoKtAgArL08is+YlDx8HlVNbIc0HEp9NV2oH+KO7tyESh6BjlSUMYFhMaiW55gK PAW3CnMQbYVVLU5Ue0105pP8wlu3wL1jPXFkpKrvh8FPYF02DDKbkIHZGHDiVEJt XTw3KABamF7+AO4xn5a9SQv+j7/bHbxgTqbU2MlJCUbZQ6olRttmtPaKeQeU3jqi EktFTGbZKiB0jQ7Jl9PDOHBjARaqE3TQZE9IXzqWTbXW5XbhjKP49OkXQECD9vvU po011AtpA9jUz6jLG99PTgYJp9AcYbXGzJcox/818DaH2zOCQdMe/bcLeFFQqEfC 0A6IThhZRhH/FgssyEipEVJnpbLS7Q== =ojEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--