From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: SGE-Pygame mysteriously downgraded on PyPI Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:07:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87wp3lpzd0.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87efqkyu8y.fsf@posteo.net> <87zi976l1i.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3oqyi17.fsf@posteo.net> <87mv4vnr21.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6gCw-000501-He for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:08:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6gCs-0007Xm-J9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:08:10 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:57315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e6gCs-0007Ur-Cw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:08:06 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64CBA20CE8 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 19:07:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87mv4vnr21.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:57:42 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hello, > > Kei Kebreau skribis: > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Kei Kebreau skribis: >>> >>>> I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but it seems that our >>>> sge-pygame package is failing to build because the package version on >>>> PyPI has downgraded from 1.5.1 to 1.5. >>> >>> How can that downgrade lead to a build failure of our package though? >>> >> >> Our sge-pygame definition uses the source code from PyPI, not from GNU >> Savannah and its mirrors where the project seems to be hosted. Because v= ersion >> 1.5.1 is no longer available from PyPI servers, our package fails to >> build. >> >> I can change the definition to get the tarball from Savannah and its >> mirrors because we already do that for python-xsge, a similar package by >> the same developer. > > Ah, got it. > > Well, I suggest you should do whichever looks most sensible to you. If > the downgrade on PyPI was motivated, but we should probably follow > suite. Otherwise, we could simply use the 1.5.1 tarball from Savannah. > > Thoughts? > > Ludo=E2=80=99. For any who may be following this thread, I've elected to use the 1.5.1 tarball from Savannah. The code change is in commit 7f652029908f23d85629e2932cc70585ba3e8a1b. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlnuIbwACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg0wrRAAq1gZ2bH0kd0cKKUfZ3JdyybKoA5IKkVxNk1nWdx8ZNyO0/O/rVcoB3iT DXQXikG8ATNGVc5ywAcLl7koCIsvdYrIGBuLLonbQJ5PtROBayNCx52tPSh04zIE t6xCF2iaPoYAZhfdY9fmrKT+RJzf1J0NKFpSFp4Eow8pZthAdxfYdfOZIn9huD87 K+qK0X+6j9K2SvIpkAm9zlwklj47TUuTcTWYBuFbbDa3rFTWrPuMkk6tWmuUlk8O /5jfLEm5q2B00j3Yq0Lwjdoz+RA3SWKsSHOG8F+MjhVfAwbKRiwNuUDmohaw16/r xnor3PG8nsek4AASIGXbJAZhk03/ffpSoHdRMQ3VEdwWDZy092yz+5vLLS/gdH7e ovoM7+2z5OSQOLO3ku+ejo8Z7t2o8+s3QIA+iRKaVE3zo0woqoF4wjvbphxqn5mJ CvM9VsYObZI0S9dNGyfA8mF9TNYwIVMcG/w4W4uiR5xG9a59iWI+Ndgd7npZYaMd JZKh1bD9xK6HF4u44CyKKAgQeb+rnY2O1hXyYHmi96M9rYYVH36blRdflvJ1jS0B PclHMk2rlXi1iWI4o2/RW0kQOMaBOJseZZaWljK/Zk6ljgORaHL4VizKKv0u2F8A iYucusfBCcqex77faFpt9N44fZDsVA9lB8fcy7J5//gIMEgIWbA= =aZ54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--