From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diego Nicola Barbato Subject: bug#29516: Maxima fails to build Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2017 15:58:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87wp23oo2p.fsf@GlaDOS.home> References: <87po7y1zzm.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <20171201174527.GA4636@jasmine.lan> <877eu61792.fsf@GlaDOS.home> <874lp912or.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLVjV-0004bh-GZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:59:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLVjS-00065O-FO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:59:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLVjS-00064u-7d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:59:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLVjR-0002W7-OK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:59:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <874lp912or.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 02 Dec 2017 12:04:36 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 29516@debbugs.gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > Diego Nicola Barbato writes: > >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Diego Nicola Barbato wrote: >>>> `guix build maxima' fails during the `check' phase with the following >>>> output: >>> >>> Thanks for your report! > > FYI, the Maxima builds started failing after the recent upgrade to > 'gcl'. I raised the issue here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-11/msg00341.html > > The person who upgraded 'gcl' first said that he could reproduce the > build failure locally, and then said that he couldn't. I'm not sure > what happened there. > > Mark This seems to be quite a strange issue indeed: Out of curiosity I tried the same thing in a VM (guix system vm-image) and even though it is the same architecture (x86_64) and the same commit (e2721a05e7d778bdf845b7cb7a42fd9f76095b69) guix consistently succeeds to build maxima in the VM while it consistently fails to build on my laptop. I also tried building with only one core on my laptop and running the VM with two cores (qemu-system-x86_64 -smp cores=2) with the same result. `guix build maxima' only fails on the VM when I run it with `--rounds=2' because the outputs differ. Diego