From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYs0l-0002YE-Pd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 06:24:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYs0g-00071k-Ko for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 06:24:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYs0g-00071X-Gb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 06:24:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYs0g-0003Yx-5T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 06:24:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29880] [PATCH] gnu: grep: Add PCRE support. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87mv22u0eq.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv1ok9ab.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgh8iabe.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmi3xvhb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Roel Janssen In-reply-to: <87bmi3xvhb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:23:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87wp0ri8de.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 29880@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello, > > Roel Janssen skribis: > >> I have been maintaining a separate package for grep with PCRE support >> for the users on our cluster. What I would like to add is that at least >> Debian and RedHat enable PCRE in their grep versions. So using Guix's >> grep broke some scripts. >> >> If compatibility with other GNU/Linux distributions counts for anything, >> I'd say we should enable it. I am in favor of enabling PCRE. > > OK, that makes sense. > >> We could provide a separate version of grep without PCRE as a >> grep-minimal. > > Alternately, what we could do is: > > 1. Keep ‘grep-final’ as it is right now (without PCRE support; this > has never been a problem so far.) > > 2. Add PCRE to ‘grep’ itself (like Oleg did). > > Thoughts? Yes that seems fine to me. Kind regards, Roel Janssen