From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Pykhalov Subject: Re: 29/88: gnu: Add emacs-let-alist. Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 20:39:32 +0300 Message-ID: <87wowg3cq3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180502172100.16240.36842@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180502172109.5B497204D2@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87zi1gtuwg.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvro6k7d.fsf@gmail.com> <87wowj5k76.fsf@gmail.com> <87o9hssoz8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFNdR-0001iq-JJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 13:39:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFNdN-0001ib-MC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 13:39:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:33545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFNdN-0001iJ-EH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 13:39:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x12-v6so12985824wmc.0 for ; Sun, 06 May 2018 10:39:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87o9hssoz8.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 06 May 2018 19:55:39 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alex Kost writes: [=E2=80=A6] > I don't understand what mechanism you mean. Why it cannot simply be > removed? =E2=80=98guix import elpa=E2=80=99 should remove =E2=80=98let-alist=E2=80= =99 or =E2=80=98guix lint=E2=80=99 should notify =E2=80=98let-alist=E2=80=99 is already present in current Emacs. >> =E2=80=98let-alist=E2=80=99 >> shouln't clutter much if it stays in Guix package collection for a time. > > But why should it stay? Since Emacs includes it, and it is not a > dependency for any package, I don't see a reason to keep it. Because people will not package it again until Guix =E2=80=98import=E2=80= =99 or =E2=80=98lint=E2=80=99 handle =E2=80=98let-alist=E2=80=99. Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc+OyAXw1EaDPCmAPckbhHGm3lWkFAlrvPdQACgkQckbhHGm3 lWmdNQ//Z5oKQ+yXmfsM18dnLovyuXrneJQpyAd9nGz0KJPVn3nlfBwi2sgLA5L9 fgy5n0XrxnvLn78BUZ3IAEh7ARlCiddWGsG2Ss3bYk0w7LmFFCfe60ZCeiUq2dE1 SNs6nDg3lT2UHLJc25ywPCK6d/SKwT0MXfceNa2rK15bssBT7Kl3A4xPQ69vJspK xbzwHV92bcNFXJnd+D3LQvS0zSy+lw05a2+LcgW+n6AhqFa1nTfxM6vqlwUoworE /QlV+ViezRt1CaNlkjmHtVXhCAeym3b3Fr1LjbgCRbj6/aR14C94pIinFVqTzkpK q4tnN22BaFrvu2AYJvaXdbDL17ujNjddnezq2Evt2zldE6gYZ1R815V1XG3Tc9Xi c0PkW/LHIqzsHrbU+3vNs3nN5hu/gFQ1ByqTLv5wSHOaoUDFHmwFIqI5t7qLNpfX rf1rKPilcG6cOsFLIEbGyXIVi1H0uu9bmaGS/5KV2Vt9IRmdr/XwsTW4aFut+WrK F3avPcCwUKmIEW3kEw/TgScxA9Rdtngx9HZ0kR9ctvW8nArXEv+EhP87N+Ehzl3n bCMnDIWdqUz5JFWG5nFtQ1Ha2uBT/Gtwb2LSfEED1OvZM6ueSZQ8/XAY8Af2p9Cj X9W8UF5OFkswbGDcfHOxmq+oohcXwKvFlb5zhniYDNlwOYhlYYA= =lXra -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--