From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Does Linux 4.16.1 blast out battery time? (9h+ -> 3h+)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 09:20:19 +0200
Message-ID: <87wowdmh1o.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <871sfjprn8.fsf@gmail.com> <20180413065059.6tvg2xsx722adl7i@doom>
	<87k1tb8srn.fsf@gmail.com> <871sfjtnuy.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87k1sx2e61.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0yo3fs7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87tvrpqlu8.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20180508211108.dhahlvreutqujxtb@abyayala>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33916)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1fGJOk-0002Ob-Fy
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 03:20:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1fGJOh-0001rT-8K
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 03:20:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <20180508211108.dhahlvreutqujxtb@abyayala>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Thanks for the tip! :)

> I can't advocate how to package or do this here (which is
> too bad),

Why not?  Is it non-free?  Custom kernel compilation is fine to discuss
on this mailing list if I'm not mistaken.  Only proprietary firmware
packaging isn't.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

> but for all things graphics related this will be suggested
> by upstream most certainly.
>
>
> 0: branch as in the repository, not linux repository itself. In case you
>    are unfamilar with linux development branching model.

Which repository?  Sorry, I didn't get this.

> 1: Variants of https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3Di91=
5%20intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler&list_id=3D579081
>    and this is still going on.

Indeed, I've seen this issue many times on a couple of machines.

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlryoTMACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH/R7wf/S2aUNZ3CcVgqC3K07JIM5k39udH4RqqjoLjg9pGbSr3k5kpp1q9N8qUL
1pMCvgbWHUlPg21GQkG4Q8AJxVu6zkZvGv9ZC+ayboMkf7I5cLxibZfm/EnDqlTK
sz5sroYmmVeBu33gH2zbWvC4XZx/s210KL6xQCYADZhEOKbWjT/UFCE4O7n3/h7a
+xbL6oL9c1Awo9dWQyzP35QjB61rtJozXK47pQhxWU2eiImBBV718uhHhXe889b4
kDkAjCARiuTxoNhSIs3GxAJQC4NhLLbaOpMFgI43ftdQ/LXaskAQOn3EIT+IFlBG
LMq3zvyko1eV7OrMSHdSoy+IVy1j9w==
=pJkL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--