From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: bug#33751: SQLite "Magellan" vulnerability
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 11:47:07 +0100
Message-ID: <87woobvzh0.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87r2ejve09.fsf@fastmail.com> <87o99nv9pa.fsf@fastmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49075)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gY7UM-0005jC-72
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 05:48:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gY7UI-0001qe-7F
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 05:48:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44730)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gY7UI-0001qa-3K
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 05:48:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gY7UI-0007GN-0V
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 05:48:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33751.B33751.154487083927860@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <87o99nv9pa.fsf@fastmail.com>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: 33751@debbugs.gnu.org


Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:

> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> There is allegedly a remote code execution bug in all versions of SQLite
>> prior to 3.26.0: <https://blade.tencent.com/magellan/index_en.html>.
>>
>> I think it is safe to graft 3.26.0 in-place:
>>
>> $ abidiff /gnu/store/pba3xzrkq2k4wgh3arif4xpkblr5qz2n-sqlite-3.24.0/lib/libsqlite3.so /gnu/store/r0krlfg010d9zj935gxx0p24pcs0kv9s-sqlite-3.26.0/lib/libsqlite3.so
>>   Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added function                                 
>>   Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable                                 
>>   Function symbols changes summary: 0 Removed, 1 Added function symbol not referenced by debug info 
>>   Variable symbols changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Added variable symbol not referenced by debug info 
>>
>>   1 Added function symbol not referenced by debug info:                                             
>>
>>     sqlite3_create_window_function
>>
>> ...but I have not tested this.  It's difficult to tell which patches to
>> apply without knowing more details of the vulnerability.
>>
>> I am currently building a branch that adds a "static" output for
>> SQLite in order to catch users of libsqlite3.a.  Can we start this on
>> Berlin concurrently?  Patches attached.
>
> Perhaps it's better to start over 'staging' with the new SQLite in the
> mean time?  Hydra didn't get too far yet.
>
> It does not add a lot to the current rebuild count.

Sounds good to me.  Thank you!

-- 
Ricardo