From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#34020: [PATCH 0/2] Re-purpose '--verbosity' to something
	useful
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 21:55:55 +0100
Message-ID: <87won82s6c.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E1ghxOe-0003Mp-EJ@rmmprod05.runbox>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50436)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gimnb-0003wk-KQ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:56:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gimnb-0002Mu-00
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:56:03 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:55288)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gimna-0002IM-Pi
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:56:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <E1ghxOe-0003Mp-EJ@rmmprod05.runbox> (ng0's message of "Fri, 11
	Jan 2019 15:02:52 +0100 (CET)")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0@n0.is
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi ng0,

<ng0@n0.is> skribis:

> Would you be open for a patch which adds BSD familiar -v behavior?
> In other words, multiple v increase the verbosity level, like -vv is more
> verbose than -v. I'll have to check the actual changes first, haven't had
> access to something which runs plain Guix in a while.

I don=E2=80=99t think (srfi srfi-37) would be able to parse it correctly, a=
nd
I=E2=80=99d also prefer to keep a single way to do that.

I like that =E2=80=98-vN=E2=80=99 is unambiguous: if you type =E2=80=98-v2=
=E2=80=99, you know you=E2=80=99ll get
exactly level 2 regardless of what options came before (and might come
from $GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS, etc.)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.