From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h49qB-0004jQ-Ds for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:47:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h49qA-0001hc-Qk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:47:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h49qA-0001hG-4f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h49q9-0001Ee-Ti for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:47:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#34848] [PATCH] Remove the last vestiges of GuixSD. Resent-Message-ID: From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <20190313192945.30680-1-somebody@not-sent-or-endorsed-by.tobias.gr> In-reply-to: <20190313192945.30680-1-somebody@not-sent-or-endorsed-by.tobias.gr> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:46:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87wol24kwu.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Cc: 34848@debbugs.gnu.org Guix, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > [PATCH] Remove the last vestiges of GuixSD. I'm running the test suite now, which on my laptop that means that I won't find that one stupid typo until tomorrow. Meanwhile: thoughts? The longer ISO image volume names shouldn't pose a problem; the limit's 32. Kind regards, T G-R