From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) Subject: Re: bug#36878: guix system reconfigure broken Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:45:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87wofycfuq.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hsrmb-0004ls-2P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:48:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsrma-0003Sf-5w for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:48:57 -0400 Received: from ol.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:64816 helo=mx.sdf.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hsrmZ-0003SF-UN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:48:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Robert Vollmert's message of "Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:18:47 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Robert Vollmert Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 36878@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Robert, Robert Vollmert writes: > Hi, > > it appears that commit 5c8c8c455420af27189d6045b3599fe6e27ad012 > > guix system: Reimplement 'reconfigure=E2=80=99. > > breaks guix system reconfigure. In particular, after reconfiguring, > shepherd doesn=E2=80=99t know about the updated versions of services. > > The usual output below is missing; after reverting the commit it=E2=80=99s > fine again. Could you please elaborate on what you mean by this? I can see that the ouput has changed, but is Shepherd doing something that indicates that it doesn't know about the new services? And is the line regarding bootloader installation also missing from 'guix system reconfigure' post-5c8c8c455? > I see that some system tests for =E2=80=9Cguix system reconfigure=E2=80= =9D were added > after this change. Might I suggest adding them before the change next > time around, and making sure they pass both before and after? Sure. My apologies for not having the foresight to do that. Regards, Jakob --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl1Bxb0ACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2VptIg//XqD591WeOt3RLoq1Q8FxgmVbdg41uRSoMU7IKWWEpvbxWGyeCy0ymEni mP5CrYAFB0Cj9hTc9VQqJGXB8Uzzu9bcltgSrdX/Mw/zSm5y4U5vScSM0APH+wNq zjaa3eRVhFS28VG6FQJ6YZWhBHivECfoPlpiPY5bytQWVH31Fs2HZqF19Tx9lL5C bMt1slnXCEsNj3HIrdcjNv0pMcbzkYXOLTN8WTve32am8raIZ3wtrKR8KkX9baZQ /beT0AsPxPp00x1E7euVekMRdZQ8he4XdakuacqlVwzNj7dRDAaIZIqGMdS9vVR+ xb2Ybt9oQCcpUNdIAGY5UMKLW44Th8N8NsISQ/Vy1J4PZSsoJZycwskMYQPWuXet Tlu2qQFAMXQhE6JmMp2hkR7kOukhHDEJfhPtzqi6G6Wvj7+z9ILNcp7wHbAdTFYP S4pgNcWPutG1FEMv24PNXHjn0bnjvKd+UCtZxUog0nW0E409HXnbdwYNOgyq9eP3 O2AkmTmW2D2zLS4Ho7nCYkCSv+afwgWaetl6IXkzezVNll+RXq+lisL2XwqBCZF7 V2lEYjqCf0TTI4VqArqUTKmJ2FS3X6EN/LC8vptmdgRBTIwqAcainaFvBLEcEXXy Zan0KjtfoQNDeG5xivdDIhvqg4/duOgTAzUcCwVQ3e1GIPRR7I4= =S1GG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--