From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: Starting 'core-updates'? Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:18:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87wo8qcy7o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2GGH-0001s0-1o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:18:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:59:47 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 38390@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: Hello Marius, > The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am > happy to report that it "works for me". :-) > > Some of the big changes include: > I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start > integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included? > Maybe wip-bootstrap Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390). I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased `wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view we are ready for merge. WYDT? Greetings, janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2GGd-0002O6-Hc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:19:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2GGc-0000FQ-Cd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:19:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2GGc-0000F3-9S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2GGc-0007vE-3p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:19:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38390] Starting 'core-updates'? Resent-Message-ID: From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen References: <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:18:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:59:47 +0100") Message-ID: <87wo8qcy7o.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 38390@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: Hello Marius, > The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am > happy to report that it "works for me". :-) > > Some of the big changes include: > I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start > integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included? > Maybe wip-bootstrap Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390). I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased `wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view we are ready for merge. WYDT? Greetings, janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com