Ludo',

Ludovic Courtès 写道：
> I strongly encourage using literal strings as patterns, it’s 
> more
> robust.  In this case, you could replace the ‘for-each’ 
> expression with
> something like (untested):
>
>   (substitute* "desktop/scripts/soffice.sh"
>     (("\\<(dirname|grep|uname)\\>" _ cmomand)
>      (which command)))
>
> WDYT?

Yeah.  I use substitute*'s wonderful pattern matching all the 
time, probably more than most.  I have no idea why it didn't occur 
to me here.

I'll push this to staging, libreoffice users have been suffering 
enough rebuilds lately.

Thanks!

T G-R