Since staging was merged a few days ago, I've noticed an undesirable side-effect of our revamped asdf-build-system: the systems packages have priority over the user-local ones. Here is the default list of registries: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defparameter* *default-source-registries* '(environment-source-registry user-source-registry user-source-registry-directory default-user-source-registry system-source-registry system-source-registry-directory default-system-source-registry) "List of default source registries" "3.1.0.102") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- `user-source-registry' points to what is read in ~/.config/common-lisp/source-registry.conf(.d/)?, so nothing by default. user-source-registry-directory reads what's in XDG_CONFIG_DIRS, and it finds the Guix packages there. The default-user-source-registry expands to --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (:SOURCE-REGISTRY (:TREE (:HOME "common-lisp/")) (:DIRECTORY (:HOME ".sbcl/systems/")) (:DIRECTORY #P"/home/ambrevar/.local/share/common-lisp/systems/") (:TREE #P"/home/ambrevar/.local/share/common-lisp/source/") :INHERIT-CONFIGURATION) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- which is where I would drop my user-local packages. Finally, default-system-source-registry reads what's in XDG_DATA_DIRS, and it finds the packages there again, but it does not read the Guix-generated conf which collects the dependencies of each package. I believe the issue is that `user-source-registry-directory' should read from XDG_CONFIG_HOME, and not XDG_CONFIG_DIRS (which would make it redundant with `user-source-registry'). This would make it an upstream issue, but I wanted to double-check I properly understood the problem with the Guix community first. Guillaume, thoughts on this? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/