From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wMQsHG/OFWBXTQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 21:23:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id KDr+F2/OFWBTGQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 21:23:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02088940366 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 21:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5xio-000739-0B for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 16:23:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5xic-00072n-3N for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 16:23:46 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51602) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5xia-00026Y-Rf; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 16:23:44 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=48868 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l5xia-0004aw-Cr; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 16:23:44 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#45919: [PATCH 0/8] Exporting a manifest and channels from a profile References: <20210116182957.31075-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87wnvyv7w6.fsf@gnu.org> <871re5t2lg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kizsk0z.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <865z3fh8pn.fsf@gmail.com> <87eei3quma.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <86sg6ifqdc.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 22:23:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86sg6ifqdc.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:31:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87wnvup19d.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel , 45919@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.85 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 02088940366 X-Spam-Score: -2.85 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: Zu+yp4jpQ+nf Hi, zimoun skribis: > Yes, but it needs a lot of re-work and change, IMHO. And we ends with 3 > files: $GUIX_PROFILE/manifest capturing the states of $GUIX_PROFILE and > the 2 others deducing an approximation of these states. Well, IMHO, > automatically produce this approximation at each =C2=ABaction=C2=BB on th= e profile > adds complexity and I am not convinced it is worth. Yeah. Actually, part of the code would be shared anyway, so we could always go with =E2=80=98--export-manifest=E2=80=99 first and think about adding the e= xtra files later. (Though I=E2=80=99m still unsure about these extra files, TBH.) Ludo=E2=80=99.