On 2022-12-20 09:16, Mekeor Melire wrote: > 2022-12-18 09:11 liliana.prikler@gmail.com: > >> I think we should be able to build an Emacs service in Guix Home that can >> manage init.el. As a workaround, use-package should also have a :when >> clause, so you can use :when (featurep 'some-package-autoloads) if you're >> unsure whether 'some-package is actually installed. This makes your init >> file a little more resilient and is particularly useful with pure shells. > > =guix home import= for init.el is a great idea! (See below for use-cases.) > > And yes, =:when (featurep 'some-package-autoloads)= is a workaround that makes > init.el files loadable even if respective packages are not available. But the > submitted code aims to enable you to install needed emacs-packages so that > such a restricting workaround is not needed. > >> Given the caveats, I would rather like to see an Emacs Lisp based script >> that mocks use-package and generates a manifest by evaluting init.el. This >> should give you more correct results. It's not a bad idea per se, but as-is, >> I think it would better be maintained in your own channel before >> upstreaming. > > Problem is that in cases where needed packages are not installed and the user > did not add =:when (featurep 'foo)= everywhere, it's possible that evaluating > init.el will fail because of some package not being available. Thus, IMHO, we > can't rely on Emacs to evaluate the init.el. But we could use Emacs to expand > the (use-package) macros inside init.el. But I doubt that it's worth it. I > rather think it's easier to use Guile to parse invocations of =require= and > =use-package=. > >> For upstreaming, I see two potential paths. The first one would be >> integration to `guix home import', which Andrew Tropin (CC'd) could probably >> tell you more on. The second would be integration into `guix package' as a >> callable function/command line argument, but IMHO that's less likely to >> pass. > > All in all, I think there are three use-cases: > > - If you want Guix Home to handle the installation of emacs- packages, there > should be =guix home import= to automatically install those packages, as > resulting from early- and init.el files. guix home import doesn't install anything, it only generates a configuration. > > - If you simply want to install all emacs- packages once per CLI, there should > be =guix package --install-from-elisp-file=~/.emacs.d/init.el= and similar > CLI-arguments or -commands, such as --install-from-elisp-expression, > --install-from-elisp-init-files. There could also be --fit-to-elisp- > variants which not only install packages, but also remove redundant, unused > emacs-* packages. I don't think we want a separate tricky flags here. Especially we don't want some implicit logic removing unused packages. Just --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix package --install-from-expression=\ ((@ (mekeor emacs-helper) generate-package-from-elisp) \ #:elisp (local-file "./init.el")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- should be enough. If you want to be sure unused packages are not installed just don't use imperative guix package and maintain you configuration in declarative manner. > > - If you want to use a manifest.scm for your Guix user-profile and > import appropriate emacs- therein, there should be Guile modules and > functions which allow to do so, as the submitted code does. Those > modules could also be used with =guix package -e=. > > And in all three cases, your early- and init.el files might load packages via > =require= or =use-package= at least. -- Best regards, Andrew Tropin