From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: university group willing to contribute to GUIX Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbwskydz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k3dhchxj.fsf@gnu.org> <52ED34A4.3020104@congresolibre.org> <52EFDBA1.5010406@congresolibre.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBRk5-0003YH-KL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:24:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBRjz-0001xD-UA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:23:57 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:58994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBRjz-0001wv-Nx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 11:23:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("Felipe \=\?utf-8\?Q\?L\=C3\=B3pez\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:32:30 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Cc: Guix Development Felipe L=C3=B3pez skribis: > 2014-02-03 Quiliro Ord=C3=B3=C3=B1ez Baca : > >> >> Depending on what you really want to do, it might be that students would >> be better off contributing to a well-established distro like Trisquel. >> >> >> The university must present a result. What result will the students >> present? I must propose that so that they get interest in contributing. >> > > Steap suggested on IRC to start developing a GUI for the package manager, > isn't that a good project? That=E2=80=99s a good idea. Technically, it might be even better to write PackageKit bindings, which would then allow us to use existing PackageKit GUIs. The other obvious task for anyone joining is writing more package definitions, of course. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.