From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ttf-symbola.
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:15:37 +0100
Message-ID: <87vbmi6emu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87iojcdp53.fsf@gmail.com> <20141023062654.GB6636@debian>
	<8761farhzp.fsf@gmail.com> <20141023173605.466.47994@rook>
	<87wq7qatee.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20141024065236.7150.29212@vulcan.local.tld>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51917)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Xp0nv-00074p-V3
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:15:48 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Xp0nr-0001ua-7P
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:15:43 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:55123)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Xp0nq-0001u3-Ku
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:15:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20141024065236.7150.29212@vulcan.local.tld> (Ian Denhardt's
	message of "Fri, 24 Oct 2014 02:52:36 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net> skribis:

> Quoting Alex Kost (2014-10-24 02:11:53)
>> Ian Denhardt (2014-10-23 21:36 +0400) wrote:
>> > We ought to be careful about this one - maybe ask someone at the FSF
>> > about whether this meets their standards, and if not maybe ask the
>> > developer if they can put something less ambiguous on it.
>>=20
>> According to <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html> such
>> questions may be asked at <licensing@fsf.org>.  But I'm afraid I'm not
>> able to ask about it properly.
>
> I'll bug them about it myself, and let you know what I hear.

Did you hear from them?

Alternately, people at gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org might have already
dealt with that?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.