From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: pcre: Update to 8.36 and enable JIT support Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87vblh0zjj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wq5y29of.fsf@netris.org> <878uiegw59.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnn923fc.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzQF8-0003xL-7T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:26:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzQEz-0000Yv-UV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:26:50 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:46722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzQEz-0000Yr-NM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:26:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bnn923fc.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:05:11 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> From 5796cf1178fbcf41ef1c3d6406adb992d7e71dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Mark H Weaver >>> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:56:00 -0500 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: pcre: Update to 8.36 and enable JIT support. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/pcre.scm (pcre): Update to 8.36. Enable JIT support. >> >> OK! >> >> Is JIT supported everywhere, or is it automatically turned off on >> platforms that don=E2=80=99t support it? > > According to the docs, passing "--enable-jit" will cause the compilation > to fail on platforms not supported by their JIT, so we might have to > make that flag conditional in the future. However, the build and test > suite passed on MIPS, and they support ARM as well, so I think it'll be > fine for the foreseeable future. OK, perfect. Ludo=E2=80=99.