From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: About webkitgtk and gtk
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 19:16:17 +0800
Message-ID: <87vbfgewla.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <70afca1c.c005.14d8a5ea532.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
	<87k2vx9buk.fsf@gmail.com> <87twv1545r.fsf@163.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41768)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1YwqM8-0003db-4U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 07:15:41 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1YwqM2-000306-Cx
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 07:15:39 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]:36826)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1YwqM2-0002zn-4j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 07:15:34 -0400
Received: by pdfh10 with SMTP id h10so68032534pdf.3
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 25 May 2015 04:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87twv1545r.fsf@163.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Cc: Feng Shu <tumashu@163.com>

Hi, you sent mails to me directly without CC to the list.

Feng Shu <tumashu@163.com> writes:

> =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Feng Shu <tumashu@163.com> writes:
>>
>>> Webkit package is like this:
>>>
>>> 1. webkitgtk-2.8.1  -->  webkit2 + gtk3.0
>>> 2. webkitgtk-2.4.8  -->  webkit + gtk2
>>>
>>> In debian, it is like this:
>>>
>>> 1. webkit2gtk  -->  webkit2 + gtk3.0
>>> 2. webkitgtk-3.0 --> webkit + gtk3.0
>>> 3. webkitgtk-1.0 --> webkit + gtk2.0
>>>
>>>
>>> I think is is more reasonable.
>> The missing one (webkit1 + gtk3.0) is not very useful,
>> deprecated and not commonly used by other projects AFAIK.
>>
>> But feel free to send a patch for it.
>
> Confusing me is the package name, I can't find the help from
> guix doc?
>
> which one is better?
>
> 1. "webkitgtk3.0"=20
> 2. "webkitgtk3"
> 3. "webkigtk_3.0"
The package name (field) should still be 'webkitgtk',
For the variable name, I think we can choose 'webkitgtk-2.4/gtk+-3'.