From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add c-ares and aria2 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 21:33:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87vb97t0tx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1446448523-27811-1-git-send-email-efraim@flashner.co.il> <87d1vryzn8.fsf@gnu.org> <20151105111953.19ef0e99@debian-netbook> <20151108153324.096b077d@debian-netbook> <87egfvxt9g.fsf@gnu.org> <20151112193844.7a3479ae@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwyYb-0003NH-6E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:33:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwyYX-0004ml-5I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:33:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151112193844.7a3479ae@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:38:44 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 14:05:31 +0100 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > >> Efraim Flashner skribis: [...] >> > ##Failure Location unknown## : Error >> > Test name: N5aria224LpdMessageDispatcherTestE::testSendMessage >> > uncaught exception of type N5aria29DlAbortExE >> > - Failed to set a socket option, cause: No such device=20=20 >>=20 >> Could you check what this test does? The =E2=80=9CNo such device=E2=80= =9D is likely due >> to our build environment not corresponding to the assumptions made by >> the test wrt. available networking capabilities. > > here's the failing line: > std::shared_ptr recvsock(new SocketCore(SOCK_DGRAM)); How do you know it=E2=80=99s this line? The =E2=80=9CFailed to set a socket option=E2=80=9D would make me think it= =E2=80=99s about a failing setsockopt(2) call, but it=E2=80=99s not supposed to return ENODEV. socket(2) is not supposed to return ENODEV either. Could you keep the failed build directory (with =E2=80=98-K=E2=80=99), and = from there run the test in =E2=80=98strace=E2=80=99 to see exactly what=E2=80=99s fail= ing? (With the caveat that it may succeed outside the build environment; did you try running =E2=80=98make check=E2=80=99 from the failed build tree, outside th= e build environment?) > I'll keep staring at it, and hopefully it'll make sense soon :) It will! :-) Cheers, Ludo=E2=80=99.