From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: gnu: Add python-wtforms. Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:07:17 -0800 Message-ID: <87vb5stdju.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87pow190jn.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87io1t8pho.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87ziv4tgzt.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20160213222307.GA1127@jasmine> <87wpq8te06.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUjHh-0004kc-Qm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:07:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUjHb-0006Yo-MU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:07:25 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:36432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUjHb-0006Yk-Ho for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:07:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <87wpq8te06.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel Christopher Allan Webber writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 01:55:01PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >>> Christopher Allan Webber writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> >>> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-wtforms, python2-wtforms): New variables. >>> >> >>> >> It looks good to me, but I wonder if the python-3 variant really needs >>> >> setuptools? If so, okay. If not, can you use the new python2-variant >>> >> system [0] to provide setuptools for python2-wtforms? >>> >> >>> >> [0] Introduced in 48b311b1b3ba >>> > >>> > Okay, I'll give that a try, and will make an adjustment if appropriate, >>> > and regardless, push after figuring that out. >>> > >>> > Thanks to both of you! >>> >>> Well, I think it's significant enough of a change where I should get >>> some validation that everything looks right before I push. New version, >>> ahoy! Is it ok? >> >> I believe that you still must call 'package-with-python2' in the >> python-2 variant, and the argument to that should be >> (strip-python2-variant python-foo). >> >> I've attached an example commit that seems to work, from one of my WIP >> branches. > > Ah, you're right! New patch! > > - Chris Leo also pointed out that the (name) redefinition might not be needed, and indeed it wasn't! And with that, pushed. Whew!