From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Fix minor typos and add missing words. Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:53:57 +0300 Message-ID: <87vb5fooa2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a8mruczj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY7nH-0008Eb-EA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:54:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY7nE-00033P-7h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:54:03 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]:35392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY7nD-00033C-W2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 02:54:00 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l143so109930388lfe.2 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:53:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a8mruczj.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:01:20 -0800") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Chris Marusich (2016-02-23 10:01 +0300) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the high quality documentation! Here's a patch to fix some > minor typos in the manual. Since "git send-email" doesn't work yet out > of the box on GuixSD (for me, at least), I've attached the patch by > hand. To make "git send-email" work, you need to install "send-email" output of "git" package: guix package -i git:send-email [...] > @cindex PID 1 > @cindex init system > -The @code{(gnu services shepherd)} provides a way to define services > -managed by the GNU@tie{}Shepherd, which is GuixSD initialization > -system---the first process that is started when the system boots, > -aka. PID@tie{}1 (@pxref{Introduction,,, shepherd, The GNU Shepherd > -Manual}). > +The module @code{(gnu services shepherd)} provides a way to define I would rather write: "The @code{(gnu services shepherd)} module ..." But I don't know if it's preferable or not, other opinions are needed. The rest fixes look good to me. -- Alex