From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-gnome
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:19:15 +0200
Message-ID: <87vb1jhl7w.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1464375363-31718-1-git-send-email-patrick.hetu@auf.org>
	<87y46ui2uk.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziqwkhkw.fsf@auf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33074)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bAdOE-0000LT-6A
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:19:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bAdO9-0002p9-UZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:19:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ziqwkhkw.fsf@auf.org> (Patrick Hetu's message of "Tue, 07 Jun
	2016 13:57:19 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Patrick Hetu <patrick.hetu@auf.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Patrick Hetu <patrick.hetu@auf.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s @ 2016-05-28 12:06 EDT:
>
>> Pushed as 9b381643f009025d97dfc0b82d2c00800c204380 with a few minor
>> changes:
>>
>>> +(define-public guile-g-wrap
>>
>> This one is already available in (gnu packages guile).  :-)
>
> Oops, I was looking for guile-g-wrap instead of g-wrap...
>
> Still, the current g-wrap package needs a new patch to fix his Makefile.in
> because the native-search-paths hooks won't find it for Guile 2.0.

But it works well to build guile-gnome AFAICS.  When is it a problem?

But yeah, patching it to match the native-search-paths is a good idea.

> Also, should I rename it to guile-g-wrap at the same time?

I don=E2=80=99t think so, because it=E2=80=99s both a program and a library=
, not just a
library (I see that this rule mine and is not spelled out in =E2=80=9CPacka=
ging
Guidelines=E2=80=9D; it probably should, if there=E2=80=99s consensus.)

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.