From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 01/03: gnu: guix: Update development snapshot.
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:35:42 +0300
Message-ID: <87vazrtr4x.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20160725223905.32486.51835@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20160725223905.5218A2200F1@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32941)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bSKJf-00020Y-G0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:35:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bSKJb-0005Nj-9E
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:35:46 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]:34639)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1bSKJa-0005NV-9c
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:35:43 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id l69so1656732lfg.1
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160725223905.5218A2200F1@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> (Andreas Enge's
	message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:39:05 +0000 (UTC)")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

> commit 95af24a2f1fb58eb9e6ee902c9330534f0aca9f3
> Author: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
> Date:   Sun Jul 24 14:58:19 2016 +0200
>
>     gnu: guix: Update development snapshot.
>=20=20=20=20=20
>     * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix-devel): Update to 97c8aef.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/package-management.scm |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm b/gnu/packages/package-m=
anagement.scm
> index cd58fde..878fed2 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ the Nix package manager.")
>    ;;
>    ;; Note: use a very short commit id; with a longer one, the limit on
>    ;; hash-bang lines would be exceeded while running the tests.
> -  (let ((commit "e9017c98d61f305b624bacaa30e8891ec0100980"))
> +  (let ((commit "97c8aef15de89799ac01b62dd9b91245c23eefcb"))
>      (package (inherit guix-0.10.0)
>        (version (string-append "0.10.0-0." (string-take commit 4)))

As Efraim noticed on #guix, the revision number wasn't updated.  I think
you forgot to do it, right?

So now this version =E2=80=9C0.10.0-0.97c8=E2=80=9D looks "older" than =E2=
=80=9C0.10.0-0.e901=E2=80=9D.
I don't know, should it be left as it is, or is it better to update the
revision?

>        (source (origin
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ the Nix package manager.")
>                        (commit commit)))
>                  (sha256
>                   (base32
> -                  "13mfk10cw6fk4diclzld56xwabshanxjcczdrjlj0wisaz32h3nl"=
))
> +                  "0sdxq87mbvig7785gzf52ywmvl3p1q1qgsczmkzrlw988xkma1dr"=
))
>                  (file-name (string-append "guix-" version "-checkout"))))
>        (arguments
>         (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments guix-0.10.0)
>
>

--=20
Alex