From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field. Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 10:46:55 +0300 Message-ID: <87vaz5rtzk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r39zcfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <871t1zoz98.fsf@gmail.com> <87invbc6hn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziombyrx.fsf@gnu.org> <87popglv3u.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh04ltg2.fsf@gnu.org> <32ade0cc-b971-a3fa-ea92-9b313955a373@uq.edu.au> <4e35f009-ba71-f430-65e6-e986365b0c77@uq.edu.au> <87twesd9jw.fsf@elephly.net> <87k2fnz7zl.fsf@gmail.com> <87ziojb6kj.fsf@elephly.net> <87lh02gzeo.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaz6bcr1.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYTem-0001zs-MC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 03:47:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYTej-0000Bt-J6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 03:47:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:35615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bYTej-0000Bo-CZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 03:46:57 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f65so12170023wmi.0 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 00:46:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (David Craven's message of "Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:05:12 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel David Craven (2016-08-12 13:05 +0300) wrote: >> Invested? Sorry, I don't understand. > > One definition of invest is: > devote (one's time, effort, or energy) to a particular undertaking > with the expectation of a worthwhile result. Ah, OK, then I'm not invested at all :-) > I just thought that you had invested some time and energy with this > issue, and don't know what your expectation of a worthwhile result is. > The question was mainly intended to say - I can't be bothered to start > a discussion on a different mailing list, but I'll offer my support if > you think it's worthwhile... Thanks, but I wouldn't like to participate in such a discussion. -- Alex