From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ola
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:47:32 +0200
Message-ID: <87vayfn5wb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87twe8qu86.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net> <871t1cl1su.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87eg5b21mu.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87k2f0zmra.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgzfr5pn.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50285)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bfRP9-0002EB-8c
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:47:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bfRP4-00039g-WD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 08:47:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87lgzfr5pn.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net> (John J. Foerch's message of
	"Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:48:52 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John J Foerch <jjfoerch@earthlink.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

John J Foerch <jjfoerch@earthlink.net> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>> gnu/local.mk         | 1 +
>>>> gnu/packages/ola.scm | 9 +++------
>>>
>>> Perhaps this could be added to something like automation.scm?
>>
>> Makes sense to me, unless there are many other OLA-related packages.
>>
>> John: could you send an updated patch incorporating suggestions from
>> Alex and Marius?  The rest LGTM.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> How about lighting.scm?  There are a few other lighting programs that
> could potentially be packaged.

Sure, fine with me!

Ludo=E2=80=99.