From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.61.0. Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:10:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaxrhr85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8737kw2tp8.fsf@gnu.org> <871t0g2o7m.fsf@gnu.org> <79cd9857b728801cd6721dcd8c15882e@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmH3D-0001C2-Du for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:09:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmH3A-0001pU-VT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:09:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <79cd9857b728801cd6721dcd8c15882e@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Guix-devel Eric Bavier writes: > On 2016-09-19 05:11, Roel Janssen wrote: >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> Dear Guix, >>> >>> I don't know what the impact of the following upgrade is, but I think >>> it >>> would be good to update Boost to the latest stable version that was >>> released on May 13th, 2016. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Roel Janssen >>> >>>> From a6409b0648352cac86a3ceb205ee183c034085f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 >>>> 2001 >>> From: Roel Janssen >>> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:08:52 +0200 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.61.0. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/boost.scm (boost): Update to 1.61.0. >>> --- >>> gnu/packages/boost.scm | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/boost.scm b/gnu/packages/boost.scm >>> index 8fe8c8e..ccc1f06 100644 >>> --- a/gnu/packages/boost.scm >>> +++ b/gnu/packages/boost.scm >>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ >>> (define-public boost >>> (package >>> (name "boost") >>> - (version "1.60.0") >>> + (version "1.61.0") >>> (source (origin >>> (method url-fetch) >>> (uri (string-append >>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ >>> ".tar.bz2")) >>> (sha256 >>> (base32 >>> - >>> "0fzx6dwqbrkd4bcd8pjv0fpapwmrxxwr8yx9g67lihlsk3zzysk8")))) >>> + >>> "0h5nk7pgxf7xsvvshj9qfpsfp9wx6gq9r78n3nx736pxq83bsix5")))) >>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>> (inputs `(("zlib" ,zlib))) >>> (native-inputs >> >> It looks like an upgrade to 1.61.0 causes a build failure for MySQL: >> >> -------------------------- BUILD OUTPUT LOG FOR MYSQL >> -------------------------- >> -- BOOST_VERSION_NUMBER is #define BOOST_VERSION 106100 >> CMake Warning at cmake/boost.cmake:266 (MESSAGE): >> Boost minor version found is 61 we need 60 >> Call Stack (most recent call first): >> CMakeLists.txt:455 (INCLUDE) >> >> >> -- BOOST_INCLUDE_DIR /gnu/store/...fzzl-boost-1.61.0/include >> -- LOCAL_BOOST_DIR >> -- LOCAL_BOOST_ZIP >> -- Could not find (the correct version of) boost. >> -- MySQL currently requires boost_1_60_0 >> >> CMake Error at cmake/boost.cmake:81 (MESSAGE): >> You can download it with -DDOWNLOAD_BOOST=1 -DWITH_BOOST= >> ------------------------ END BUILD OUTPUT LOG FOR MYSQL >> ------------------------ >> >> So I guess the impact is too large to just go for it. >> >> Do we have a Guix command to find out which packages are dependent on >> a package (in this case Boost)? >> >> Kind regards, >> Roel Janssen > > I looked at this upgrade a few weeks ago. I took a stab at building the > complete dependency set, and, for the most part, mysql is the only > package that breaks. I fixed this with the below patch (which also > enable parallel builds that can improve build times significantly): > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/boost.scm b/gnu/packages/boost.scm > index bb123d3..f3288d1 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/boost.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/boost.scm > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ > (define-public boost > (package > (name "boost") > - (version "1.60.0") > + (version "1.61.0") > (source (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > ".tar.bz2")) > (sha256 > (base32 > - > "0fzx6dwqbrkd4bcd8pjv0fpapwmrxxwr8yx9g67lihlsk3zzysk8")))) > + > "0h5nk7pgxf7xsvvshj9qfpsfp9wx6gq9r78n3nx736pxq83bsix5")))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > (inputs `(("zlib" ,zlib))) > (native-inputs > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ > (arguments > (let ((build-flags > `("threading=multi" "link=shared" > + (format #f "-j~a" (parallel-job-count)) > > ;; Set the RUNPATH to $libdir so that the libs find each > other. > (string-append "linkflags=-Wl,-rpath=" > diff --git a/gnu/packages/databases.scm b/gnu/packages/databases.scm > index e05232d..5d7fe13 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/databases.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/databases.scm > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ SQL, Key/Value, XML/XQuery or Java Object storage > for their data model.") > > "11qbib1xpy0zkki7j9ip17hks5kp5zgpcj7x8gy3a4m66lb1mgsh")))) > (build-system cmake-build-system) > (arguments > - '(#:configure-flags > + `(#:configure-flags > '("-DBUILD_CONFIG=mysql_release" > "-DWITH_SSL=system" > "-DWITH_ZLIB=system" > @@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ SQL, Key/Value, XML/XQuery or Java Object storage > for their data model.") > (lambda _ > ;; Mysql wants boost-1.59.0 specifically > (substitute* "cmake/boost.cmake" > - (("59") "60")))) > + (("59") > + ,(match (string-split (package-version boost) > #\.) > + ((_ minor . _) minor)))))) > (add-after > 'install 'remove-extra-binaries > (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys) This patch looks good to me. I changed the `(("59") "60")' construct to `(("59") "61")' myself, and that seemed to work. Your solution is better because this will continue to work in the future, plus the parallel building is nice. Is there anything that requires more work to apply your patch for MySQL and then upgrade Boost? Are there any other packages that break that we should look into? Kind regards, Roel Janssen